Keywords
Carbon emission performance
Fuel and energy companies
Digital transformation
Fixed-effects model
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines the effects of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance on carbon emission performance in fuel and energy companies and investigates whether digital transformation moderates this relationship in high-carbon industries.
Methodology/approach: Using panel data from Chinese A-share, the study applies a two-way fixed-effects regression model to control for firm- and time-specific effects. Carbon emission performance is measured by the logarithm of operating revenue per unit of carbon emissions. ESG performance is proxied by standardized ESG ratings, while digital transformation is captured through a composite index. Robustness checks include sample exclusion during the COVID-19 period and regressions with lagged variables.
Originality/Relevance: The study integrates ESG governance and digital transformation within a unified analytical framework, contributing to a deeper understanding of how digital technologies enhance the effectiveness of ESG-based environmental management in high-carbon sectors.
Key findings: The results show that ESG performance has a significant positive impact on corporate carbon emission performance. Moreover, digital transformation strengthens this relationship by enhancing firms’ ability to translate ESG practices into effective carbon reduction outcomes.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: This research advances the ESG and environmental performance literature by demonstrating the moderating role of digital transformation. It provides empirical evidence that digital technologies function as a key enabling mechanism for ESG effectiveness, offering a novel “ESG–digital transformation” perspective for future studies on green and low-carbon development in high-carbon industries.
References
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
Bai, C., Feng, C., Yan, H., Yi, X., Chen, Z., & Wei, W. (2022). Digital transformation and carbon emission performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130821.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130821
Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2014). Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 43(2), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.014
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.
https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Han, S., Zhang, H., Li, H., & Xun, Z. (2025). Digital transformation and carbon emission reduction: The moderating effect of external pressure and support. Journal of Cleaner Production, 500, 145108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145108
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
He, F., Ding, C., Yue, W., & Liu, G. (2023). ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550
He, L., & Chen, K. (2023). Digital transformation and carbon performance: Evidence from firm-level data. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(10), 23639–23664.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03143-x
International Energy Agency. (2022). World energy outlook 2022. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023. IPCC.
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
Meng, C., Wang, L., & Lin, Y. (2024). Digital governance and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from “National Pilot Policy of Information Benefiting the People” in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 368, 122179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122179
OECD. (2021). OECD business and finance outlook 2021: Sustainable and resilient finance. OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/edfbca02-en
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Stavins, R. N. (2020). The future of U.S. carbon-pricing policy. Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, 1, 8–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/706792
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
World Economic Forum. (2022). Net-zero challenge: The supply chain opportunity.
https://www.weforum.org/reports/net-zero-challenge-the-supply-chain-opportunity
Zheng, M., Luo, Z., & Kang, Y. (2025). Digital transformation, green governance, and emission reduction efficiency in high-carbon industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 140256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140256
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence