Palabras clave
ESG results
Competitive intelligence
Corporate governance
China
Sustainability strategy
Cómo citar
Resumen
Purpose: This study analyzes how employee ownership influences Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance in China and examines the role of Competitive Intelligence (CI) as a strategic governance capability aligning ownership incentives with sustainability outcomes. A comparative governance perspective is adopted to explore differences among employee-owned, state-influenced, and traditionally governed firms within the Chinese institutional context.
Methodology/approach: The research employs a qualitative, conceptual design grounded in an integrative governance framework. A systematic review of interdisciplinary literature on employee ownership, ESG performance, corporate governance, and competitive intelligence was conducted using major academic databases. Comparative institutional reasoning contextualizes ownership-based governance mechanisms within China’s regulatory, socio-political, and market environment.
Originality/Relevance: While prior studies have examined ESG and ownership structures separately, limited attention has been given to CI as a governance capability moderating the relationship between employee ownership and ESG outcomes, particularly in emerging economies. This study conceptualizes CI as a dynamic governance mechanism enhancing information transparency, stakeholder alignment, and sustainability-oriented decision-making.
Key findings: The theoretical synthesis indicates that employee ownership strengthens ESG performance when supported by structured CI systems. CI operates as a governance-processing capability that converts ownership incentives into informed sustainability decisions. Variations in governance configurations explain differences in ESG outcomes across ownership types in China.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: The study advances literature by integrating employee ownership, ESG, and CI within a comparative governance framework and positions CI as a dynamic governance capability, providing a foundation for future empirical research.
Citas
Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K. A., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483–573. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1024503
Aguilera, R. V., Marano, V., & Haxhi, I. (2019). International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3346138
Appiah‐Kubi, E., Dura, C. C., Niță, D., Drigă, I., Preda, A., & Baltador, L. A. (2024). The effect of digitalization on sustainability reporting: The role of sustainability competence, green knowledge integration, and stakeholder pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 1133–1153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4024
Blasi, J., Freeman, R. B., & Kruse, D. (2016). The citizen’s share: Putting ownership back into democracy. Yale University Press.
Calof, J. L., & Wright, S. (2008). Competitive intelligence: A practitioner, academic and inter-disciplinary perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 42(7–8), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810877114
Chikwe, J. E., & Ibekwe, W. (2021). The drivers of corporate social responsibility (CSR): A thematic review and new research agenda. Journal of International Business and Economy, 7(2), 46–56.
Chourou, L., Himick, D., & Saadi, S. (2023). Regulatory uncertainty and corporate social responsibility. Finance Research Letters, 55, 104020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104020
Dishman, P. L., & Calof, J. L. (2008). Competitive intelligence: A multiphasic precedent to marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 42(7–8), 766–785. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810877141
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Fadhlurrahman, M. A., Riyanta, S., & Ras, A. R. (2024). The role of competitive intelligence in strategic decision-making: A literature review. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 3(10), 2307–2324. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i9.411
García‐Sánchez, I., Hussain, N., Khan, S., & Martínez‐Ferrero, J. (2021). Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Examining the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2186
George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2020). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425
Kang, Y., & Kim, B. (2012). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese corporate reform. China Economic Review, 23(2), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2012.03.006
Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10209
Kruse, D., Freeman, R., & Blasi, J. (2010). Do workers gain by sharing? Employee outcomes under employee ownership, profit sharing, and broad-based stock options. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391006400101
Li, L., Saat, M. M., & Jiayi, W. (2024). The effect of ESG disclosure on firm value: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i1/20524
Li, Y., & Li, S. (2024). ESG performance and innovation quality. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 1361–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.063
Liu, H., & Lee, H. (2024). The role of ownership structure in the relationship between environmental, social, and governance practices and financial reporting quality: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 16(23), 10687. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310687
Maluleka, M. L., & Chummun, B. Z. (2023). Competitive intelligence and strategy implementation: Critical examination of present literature review. South African Journal of Information Management, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v25i1.1610
Octavio, M. F. R., Setiawan, D., Aryani, Y. A., & Arifin, T. (2025). Corporate governance as a driver: Enhancing ESG performance in ASEAN companies. Business Strategy & Development, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70104
Octavio, M. F. R., Setiawan, D., Aryani, Y. A., & Arifin, T. (2025b). Ownership structure and ESG performance: An empirical analysis of Indonesian companies. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-10-2024-0449
Ogu, S. J. (2024). Employee participation in decision-making and organizational commitment: A study of modern organizations. Journal of Commerce Management and Tourism Studies, 3(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.58881/jcmts.v3i1.208
Orazayeva, A., & Arslan, M. (2022). Employee ownership, corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from the UK. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 14(4), 362. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmfa.2022.126551
Pan, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, Z. (2025). Corporate ESG performance, ownership structure and export intensity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 31(1), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3167
Pendleton, A., & Robinson, A. (2011). Employee share ownership and human capital development: Complementarity in theory and practice. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x10387650
Schiehll, E., Ahmadjian, C., & Filatotchev, I. (2014). National governance bundles perspective: Understanding the diversity of corporate governance practices at the firm and country levels. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12067
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Wang, J., Hu, X., & Zhong, A. (2022). Stock market reaction to mandatory ESG disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103402
Wang, J., & Tan, C. H. (2019). Mixed ownership reform and corporate governance in China’s state-owned enterprises. SSRN Electronic Journal, 53(3), 1055–1107. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3476155
Wang, W., Zhao, C., Jiang, X., Huang, Y., & Li, S. (2020). Corporate environmental responsibility in China: A strategic political perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(1), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-12-2019-0448
Zhao, R., Xu, J., Zhao, Y., & Feng, Y. (2025). Resource allocation pattern to green technology innovation efficiency: Synergy between environmental resource orchestration and firms’ digital capabilities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(4), 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100760
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2026 Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence